OUR VIEW: Some campaigns got too dirty

With the campus buzzing about recent incidents regarding the Associated Students of USU Executive Council races, more specifically two candidates, some may need to see some reminders about campaign etiquette.

Seeing the unusual tactics candidates take to campaign, such as the walking penguin costume and the much talked-about camel, we realize election week can get pretty competitive. Yet, a line has been crossed in showing student support.

Supporting one or more candidates is something each student should take a part of. Understanding platforms and choosing those who are qualified to speak on behalf of the students is commendable. However, when that support for a candidate changes to an attack on another – and not just on their platforms but rather determining their “moral character” – then the behavior of positively participating in the elections has been broken.

To attack a candidate’s character on the basis of their personal preference not only is hurtful to that candidate, but rather it deems our election process as a whole. It is our hope that students can engage in our student body elections based on issues, platforms and qualifications rather than agreeing or disagreeing with an individual’s lifestyle.

Yes, the free cookies, candy and dodging those distributing fliers was fun for the time. However, we also like civility, respect for all candidates and campaigns based on, well, campaigns. Most students used respect and civility to campaign for others. But, at least one didn’t. And, as much as it may be considered free speech, it shouldn’t happen again.