LETTER: War is just too risky for U.S.

Editor,

Joe Dougherty’s article defending The Statesman’s pro-war position is a candid illustration of the reasons for war against Iraq.

First, it discusses the new fear-inspiring weapons being developed. I feel fear – cold and paralyzing – whenever I think about biological warfare.

Second, the article articulates the desire to stand loyally with our country and our president.

If Joe and I are typical, then Americans are motivated by fear and loyalty, two emotions currently aligned at their peak throughout this country. Interestingly, much of the world opposes the war for the same two reasons – fear of war’s consequences, and loyalty to the democratic peace-keeping process entrusted to the United Nations.

The trouble with motivators like fear and loyalty is they have a holographic tendency, making a situation look different depending on the position of the viewer. May I submit that the position of the United States of America right now is far from the normal center? We’re scared, we’re angry, and we’re indignant. Combine any of these feelings with the largest destructive arsenal in the world, and you get a very bad reason to go to war.

I oppose war with Iraq, because I have not yet heard a compelling argument in its favor. What I’m waiting for is sound evidence that Saddam poses an immediate threat to the Western world. I want to hear that there will be post-war stability in Iraq. Most importantly, I want to hear that all peaceable means have been exhausted. I’ve heard almost no talk of peaceful alternatives, except the dismissive claim that none is viable.

Instead, I hear rage against the sources of our fear, contending that Saddam is evil, that terrorists must not triumph, and that opposing a war is unpatriotic. What I hear is the clamor of a country intoxicated with anger, pride and fear.

We must refuse to go to war out of fear and blind loyalty. If we go to war against Hussein’s regime, let it be a careful, multilateral action against the specific threat he poses.

Nathan Hammond